fits in with the landscape because this is taking place illegally as we speak, including in new yo and connecticut and the markets that your signal reaches. we're looking to capture what is happening illegal and tax it and make it an environment where consumer can be safer to play in the benefit of tax revenue. >> if you look at the revenue, talking about taxing at a rate of 15%, it could cover the revenue could be increased to $300 million of reading in the first year. the only thing about it, there is not a lot of positive social value. even though you are getting that tax revenue, do you think overall t is worth it? >> people made this same argument about broadcast television. started that. melissa: no, no. that is not the same argument. i am saying that you are turning people into a degenerate gamblers and they're home as opposed to the doing something else. encouraging gambling in your home, there is not a positive social benefit to gambling in home. a lot of great tax revenue, but i don't know that that is necessarily the externalities' are great. >> raw umber, government cannot legislate mo